Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I tend to think your right... the castle combo is sweet but nero is heavy... mmx is even pushing limits in nero... i have a brand new mmx sitting here with xt90 connectors on it...I suppose I should throw it in the fazon and see how it does with the stock motor.Yah castle makes great motors but I guess technically the castle mmx combo does use a "smaller" higher kV motor so maybe 2200 is just not low enough for such a heavy truck. I'm tempted to try to find a good like 1600kv motor I think that would be perfect
With all gearing the same yeah that's the effect. More torque and efficiency less max rpm. But the advantage is when you lower kV you typically can gear up to match top speed and still maintain the lower temp. I think I'll use 15t for bashing and I bet with the 17t I'll achieve the same top speed if I want toHaha it happens man! Well do let us know. What does a loker KV rating do then? More tq less speed? I don't want to loose a ton of speed with a lower KV motor swap, though its better than having esc shut down.
I have put stock nero motor back in my nero for the moment, though I did notice that the can was loose and was wobbly.. , so I tightened up a couple screws around the base.
I'm going from stock to 1500 so 2000kv to 1500 kV. So if I'm on 6s my max rpm will be 33,000rpm. The castle might be capable of 60k but it can only achieve the rpm available by the kV of the motor x the voltage you're using. So your set up can theoretically achieve 48,840 at 22.2v. The stock motor on 6s would be 44,400rpm. I'm hoping that with the low kV and lower rpm I can get close to stock speed with gearing up. I may be able to go up past 17t if everything stays really cool. I'll definitely let you know if it just turns into a slow torque beast lol. Hopefully not!Huh. So you went from a 2200kv to a 1500kv and think you can get the same speed, or close with the 17T and less heat and more runtime? I am very curious to see how it turns out man. I'm not being a smartass, just curious. I may be looking at a new motor if my Castle 2200kv is bad. Let us know how it goes!! And I'll keep updated for my nero setup also.
I did notice that the Castle1515 says it does roughly 60,000 rpm.. What does the Nero motor do stock? Anyone know?
And I spoke with Joe, he says the motor temp will be wrong in the data log because it is a sensorless motor.
I'm sure you'd like it - I remember reading that they started like 15 years ago and were a premier manufacturer of some of the motors for big name brushless motor comoanies so quality isn't an issue. I love that that motor has like a trillion slot stator too.Haha, yeah all that tq would not be as much fun without some good speed still! According to Joe, I'm still hitting 51000 rpm on the castle motor, but my amps are running over 220, which is causing the esc to go into overheat shutdown. Thats what we are trying to figure out why.. That and my ripple is still a bit high.
Hopefully I can get a full run in on the stock nero motor though. Ill look at the settings tonight and test tomorrow.
Hey Cr3pitus what do you think about this from SkyRc..?
http://www.skyrc.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=39&product_id=235
The price is ridiculously low and have heard good things about their other motors.. I know you said you got their1500KV motor, this one is 1950KV.. I may just bite the bullet and try it. Lol
I only know about a decent enthusiast amount. I just keep my understanding at the usable level - basically poles = # of magnets moving. More magnets means more torque and more efficiency which is good for larger vehicles. More poles also allows a lower kV motor to overcome the low kV rpm limitations a little to achieve higher rpm than a motor of equal kV but fewer poles. As far a the stator, that's the magnets that aren't moving. The more you have in the stator the more efficiently the motor "turns" because there's less gap in between the magnet the rotor just passed, and the next magnet it's moving towards.So you seem to know a lot about motors and stuff, what does it mean that it has 18 slot stator and 6 pole design. I know the Nero is 4 pole stock, same with Castle 2200. Does more poles mean more tq with less effort?
I only know about a decent enthusiast amount. I just keep my understanding at the usable level - basically poles = # of magnets moving. More magnets means more torque and more efficiency which is good for larger vehicles. More poles also allows a lower kV motor to overcome the low kV rpm limitations a little to achieve higher rpm than a motor of equal kV but fewer poles. As far a the stator, that's the magnets that aren't moving. The more you have in the stator the more efficiently the motor "turns" because there's less gap in between the magnet the rotor just passed, and the next magnet it's moving towards.
With your logging capabilities, it would be really cool to compare the amperage draw of the factory motor on 15t to the castle on 13t.Hey Havoc, thanks for the insite and input! I actually ordered a 13T pinion for my Castle 2200KV and it showed up today. I think I am still going to run the stock motor tomorrow and see how it runs with the MMX esc though. I really need to trouble shoot and see if I can get the esc to stop going into thermal shutdown. So step one atm is use stock motor with stock gearing, which is installed, just not ran yet. After this I may put on the 13T pinion, or I may order that SkyRc motor I posted the link to, undecided atm. One thing at a time though. Haha
Legit way of thinking about it! 19 is precisely what I was going to order, and then test between the supplied 17 and the 19. I wouldn't mind losing 3mph top end but also lose a bunch of heat and gain even more grunt.I look at things slightly wrong but also slightly right at the same time. given the hypothetical that every motor has the same efficiency, you're going to need to adjust gearing according to KV to maintain the same load. overloading motors is what's generating the heat.
The castle motor is 2200kv vs the stock 2000. in my own un scientific brain thought, you're gaining 10% in rpm/volt but are losing 10% in torque. running the same pinion would yeild higher speeds on the castle motor for sure, but at a 10% higher load. to equalize the load to rpm and voltage, you want to take 10% of your gear out. so with a factory 15t pinion, you would want to take 1.5 teeth out. rounded to a real gear, a 13t pinion would be a good choice. you can also think backwards, that running a 15t pinion on the castle motor is similar to running a 17t on a stock motor, and the 17t is really closer to a 19t on the stock motor.
Of course there are exceptions and different efficiencies of motors, but I feel this is a decent rule of thumb. so in the case of the 1500kv motor, to achieve stock 15t pinion speeds and load, you'd need a 19t pinion.
the cool thing with lower kv motors is that you CAN gear them lower to achieve higher torque at slower speeds. pinions only come so small. if the smallest pinion you can buy is 13t and you still don't have enough torque from the 2000kv motor, the 1500kv motor will give you that range. (i used 13t as an example... I don't know what's really available)
The same is true on the other end of the spectrum regarding speed. higher kv gets you more speed. you just are at the mercy of load.
Legit way of thinking about it! 19 is precisely what I was going to order, and then test between the supplied 17 and the 19. I wouldn't mind losing 3mph top end but also lose a bunch of heat and gain even more grunt.
Legit way of thinking about it! 19 is precisely what I was going to order, and then test between the supplied 17 and the 19. I wouldn't mind losing 3mph top end but also lose a bunch of heat and gain even more grunt.
Register and gain access to Discussions, Reviews, Tech Tips, How to Articles, and much more - on the largest Arrma RC community for RC enthusiasts that covers all aspects of the Arrma-RC brand!
Register Today It's free! This box will disappear once registered!