What Arrma models would you drop?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TheBadazz

RCHolic
Premium Member
Messages
1,677
Reaction score
2,716
Location
Chi
Arrma RC's
  1. 4x4-Mega
  2. BigRock 4x4
  3. Felony
  4. Fireteam
  5. Granite
  6. Infraction
  7. Limitless
  8. Kraton 8S
  9. Kraton 6s
  10. Mojave EXB
  11. Notorious
  12. Outcast 4s
  13. Outcast 6s
  14. Outcast 8s
  15. Senton 6s
  16. Senton 3s
  17. Senton Mega
  18. Talion
  19. Typhon 3s
  20. Typhon 6s
  21. Vendetta
  22. Vorteks
  23. Infraction 4x4
In light of the current Outcast EXB being discontinued. What model do Arrma need to drop, in your opinion of course.

Me, the 2wd line, no thanks!
The Vorteks
The Notorious should be the alternate color of the Outcast.
Even though they are slightly different, the Infraction 6s should be the main vehicle, the Felony should be the alternate color. (Yes I know about the rear tires)
All EXBs are rollers only.
The Vendetta should lead, the Infraction should be an alternative color.

I know this make no sense to some, others I'm sure understands.
 
I think arrma should drop the rc car with the most suspension travel. It will handle it best. :ROFLMAO:
In all seriousness, I think arrma should drop the voltage and make a proper 2wd rc car.

Next question what do you want arrma to make to replace the void in their marketing? A CRAWLER. :ROFLMAO:
I want arrma to make a completely redesigned (but still same basic features) Nero platform.
 
Can't say for sure without access to their sales data, but I would guess the EXB RTRs (more expensive and marginally improved versions of other models) and EXB rollers (niche product for serious hobbyists and spektrumphobes) have been on the chopping block for a reason. Fireteam seems a likely candidate for cancellation as it's more expensive and polarising than other 6s models. TLR Typhon also stands out as being caught between two worlds: Too expensive and specialised to appeal to most bashers, not competitive against proper race kits on a track.

3s line is probably their highest volume product, and since all the models use 90% of the same parts - plastics that are cheap to produce but must generate ROI on initially expensive tooling - I doubt they have much incentive to start cutting there. Internet comments make the 8s line seem like a flop, but how true this is in the real world I haven't a clue. They probably want to keep at least one model to have coverage of this market segment.

Written based on what I think makes sense from a business perspective rather than what I would personally like to see.
 
Ha! Id say put all the 4s stuff in the 3s as standard. The 3s gears are all so weak. And the 6s shocks. Then I think it’s good.
Yes but you are still stuck with the slipper and motor module that are in dire need of a redesign.
 
exactly why the nero needs a v2

Jason said they won't make a new Nero as there isn't any way to make it work, which is completely bs. They could design it with normal shock towers like Savage and Hyper MT. They would probably have to redesign the a arms a little bit too.
 
Jason said they won't make a new Nero as there isn't any way to make it work, which is completely bs. They could design it with normal shock towers like Savage and Hyper MT. They would probably have to redesign the a arms a little bit too.
The problem is the nero is iconic for the cantilever suspension, TVP chassis, and diff brain. Was the lawsuit over the diff brain or the suspension?
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 90 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Back
Top