With the second SMART-capable Arrma rig now in my collection, the prospect of 1 transmitter for both rigs becomes invreasingly tempting.
What's even more tempting is the capability of the DX5 Pro to program the ESC comfortably from the transmitter, and to provide real-time telemetry on crucial components: ESC temps, battery temps, voltages, complete with alarms when user-defined thresholds are reached. Yes, I could use a heat gun, but 1) that heat gun needs to be purchased as well, and 2) it doesn't give me real-time data while driving but only after driving.
On top of that there's better control, more range, lots of fancy customization options for both the transmitter and the rig, but it's really the real-time telemetry that lures me.
Drawback is, I'd be kinda locked into the Spektrum ecosystem, I suppose. Spektrum ESCs, Spektrum lipos. As of now that's not a big issue as I run Spektrum G1 and G2 exclusively, and both rigs are fitted with Spektrum SMART ESCs as well. But if I ever go for another manufacturer (like Hobbywing, or Castle) I'd probably lose access to all those nice SMART telemetry features. Then what?
Will the DX5 Pro just keep functioning albeit with the functionality of a standard transmitter? Like no more ESC programming and SMART stuff, but what about all those profiles and handling customization options?
I'm also wondering whether or not sticking to the Spektrum stuff might not be the worst thing to do if that gives me access to real-time telemetry? Sure, Hobbywing or Castle might go a bit faster, but I suppose I could still run their motors with a Spektrum SMART ESC, and from what I read the Hobbywing/Castle ESCs tend to have overheating issues as well.
Finally, is there a real alternative when it comes to real-time telemetry?
Futaba has some options, but honestly, sticking external sensors to various components and routing a ton of cables through the car seems slightly dated in 2023. Even more so as each sensor has to be purchased separately, on top of an already pretty expensive transmitter.
I guess what I'm ultimately asking is this:
Would going for an DX5 Pro and sticking to the Spektrum ecosystem actually offer more fun due to better monitoring data and thus better adaptation of the vehicles to their working environments, resulting in less problems when running them? Or is the gain by switching electronics to non-Spektrum stuff so large and overheating such an overinflated issue that telemetry is a mere gimmick?
Also, has the DX5 Pro to be considered "bad enough" in comparison to a Futaba T4PM (for example) to warrant the additional purchase of 2 receivers, pushing the price difference accordingly?
Sorry for the amount of questions, there's really a lot of stuff I don't know, especially when it comes to all things transmitters, receivers, and telemetry.
What's even more tempting is the capability of the DX5 Pro to program the ESC comfortably from the transmitter, and to provide real-time telemetry on crucial components: ESC temps, battery temps, voltages, complete with alarms when user-defined thresholds are reached. Yes, I could use a heat gun, but 1) that heat gun needs to be purchased as well, and 2) it doesn't give me real-time data while driving but only after driving.
On top of that there's better control, more range, lots of fancy customization options for both the transmitter and the rig, but it's really the real-time telemetry that lures me.
Drawback is, I'd be kinda locked into the Spektrum ecosystem, I suppose. Spektrum ESCs, Spektrum lipos. As of now that's not a big issue as I run Spektrum G1 and G2 exclusively, and both rigs are fitted with Spektrum SMART ESCs as well. But if I ever go for another manufacturer (like Hobbywing, or Castle) I'd probably lose access to all those nice SMART telemetry features. Then what?
Will the DX5 Pro just keep functioning albeit with the functionality of a standard transmitter? Like no more ESC programming and SMART stuff, but what about all those profiles and handling customization options?
I'm also wondering whether or not sticking to the Spektrum stuff might not be the worst thing to do if that gives me access to real-time telemetry? Sure, Hobbywing or Castle might go a bit faster, but I suppose I could still run their motors with a Spektrum SMART ESC, and from what I read the Hobbywing/Castle ESCs tend to have overheating issues as well.
Finally, is there a real alternative when it comes to real-time telemetry?
Futaba has some options, but honestly, sticking external sensors to various components and routing a ton of cables through the car seems slightly dated in 2023. Even more so as each sensor has to be purchased separately, on top of an already pretty expensive transmitter.
I guess what I'm ultimately asking is this:
Would going for an DX5 Pro and sticking to the Spektrum ecosystem actually offer more fun due to better monitoring data and thus better adaptation of the vehicles to their working environments, resulting in less problems when running them? Or is the gain by switching electronics to non-Spektrum stuff so large and overheating such an overinflated issue that telemetry is a mere gimmick?
Also, has the DX5 Pro to be considered "bad enough" in comparison to a Futaba T4PM (for example) to warrant the additional purchase of 2 receivers, pushing the price difference accordingly?
Sorry for the amount of questions, there's really a lot of stuff I don't know, especially when it comes to all things transmitters, receivers, and telemetry.