I've done a ton of research on servos and watched a lot of YT reviews on various servos. Can't go wrong with AGFRC, and as was previously stated, they manufacture the Reefs and PP servos. I will say that I recently purchased an AGFRC off of amazon from the AGFRC store and it was previously used (seal broken, a little dirt, and marks from prior mounting). It was all good though, returned through amazon....
That’s great! I understood that they made servos for other brands, but I didn’t know specifically they were reefs and perfect pass. Some of them are programmable. From your research are there benefits to a programmable servo like that one I posted?
Sweet!! Thanks man, I greatly appreciate it. What do you think about the perfect past servos compared to the one that I posted? And what do you think about programmable servos?
I’ve heard people saying that they manufacture the perfect pass servos. I wonder what kind of changes were made or if it’s literally a simple re-brand. I know Raz said that they made it self centered better and it’s stronger and all this other stuff, but I’m not sure how much of it is marketing versus actual improvements. I’m still wondering what the benefits of a programmable servo are… little bug me till I find out.
I like to set the center and endpoints on the servo rather than adjusting the the sub trim and EPA on the transmitter. I'm using futaba servos so I can program through the transmitter rather than hooking it up to the computer. As far as programing other parameters, for the most part it's more a a novelty rather than necessity for bashing or other non-race applications. I read somewhere that the PP servos used the same programming dongle as the AGFRC but that's unconfirmed. One issue with the PP servos is that the specs weren't published, at least not when I researched them.... Personally I'd go for AGFRC instead of PP simply because I'd know what I was getting in terms of speed and torque but shiny aluminum looks pretty nice....
That is the one I’ve been looking at!
Thank you, I got a basic understanding of what the programing could be used for. I do like the idea of being able to set center and endpoints via programming. Thanks!!
oh, you posted the 86 not the 81. 81 is better for you application IMO
Yep that’s the one I’m thinking on. It’s gotten a lot of votes to lol
Ok got it
What if I prefer torque over high speed?
I’m running one of those in my noto. Had two fail previously but this one’s doing well. Thanks man, much appreciated!
rather excited to get it installed!Register and gain access to Discussions, Reviews, Tech Tips, How to Articles, and much more - on the largest Arrma RC community for RC enthusiasts that covers all aspects of the Arrma-RC brand!
Register Today It's free! This box will disappear once registered!
