- Messages
- 3,034
- Reaction score
- 5,802
- Location
- Mechanicsville, MD
- Arrma RC's
- Infraction
- Kraton 6s
- Typhon 3s
- Infraction 4x4
I know I’m going to get a lot of flack for this, but I’m going to post it anyway.
Forgive me, but I don’t understand the big deal about 4s. Why would you expect Arrma to make a 4s when they have a 6s that can be run on 4s? It makes no economic sense to redesign a 3s or 6s to run 4s. Why would a manufacturer upgrade 3s parts or downgrade 6s parts for a small market that wants 4s? The 6s is stronger than the 3s, so there’s no need to put a 4s chassis in between. I can see it now: the 4s folks will want to upgrade to 6s parts. If you think having 4s parts will reduce the cost, you are sadly mistaken. It could actually increase the cost. I run my Kraton 6s on 4s, and I’m fine with that.
Forgive me, but I don’t understand the big deal about 4s. Why would you expect Arrma to make a 4s when they have a 6s that can be run on 4s? It makes no economic sense to redesign a 3s or 6s to run 4s. Why would a manufacturer upgrade 3s parts or downgrade 6s parts for a small market that wants 4s? The 6s is stronger than the 3s, so there’s no need to put a 4s chassis in between. I can see it now: the 4s folks will want to upgrade to 6s parts. If you think having 4s parts will reduce the cost, you are sadly mistaken. It could actually increase the cost. I run my Kraton 6s on 4s, and I’m fine with that.