When Arrma released the first 4x4 mega serie i thought "Arrma has made a plastic chassis the most cheap to make, and they follow TRX business with plastic CVD". When i saw the 3s BLX performance, after have read all the issues from those who have tempted to use the mega on 3s, i have been more tempted and finally bought the BRCC. When i got the BRCC, i was a little bit surprised to see plastic balls on all the tie rods, wow, that's really designed to be cheap. I'm pretty happy with the BRCC, even if it isn't wide enough and need to be widen, but i still don't like the plastic CVD. The slipper access isn't easy and the slipper adjustement itself isn't so easy too.
When i see the 4s line issues, i think that 3s is the good spot for these chassis. But Arrma has pushed too far the concept, like TRX did with their 20 year old chassis, iniitally built to be used with brushed motor and now sell them with brushless system.
Imo, Arrma isn't perfect and did some mistakes. Like the last 2WD chassis, also built to be very cheap to made, they didn't last long, as for the durability and on the market.
I first like Arrma for the 6s line, but all they did arround are more questionable, imho.
When i see the 4s line issues, i think that 3s is the good spot for these chassis. But Arrma has pushed too far the concept, like TRX did with their 20 year old chassis, iniitally built to be used with brushed motor and now sell them with brushless system.
Imo, Arrma isn't perfect and did some mistakes. Like the last 2WD chassis, also built to be very cheap to made, they didn't last long, as for the durability and on the market.
I first like Arrma for the 6s line, but all they did arround are more questionable, imho.
Last edited: